首页> 外文OA文献 >Comfort of two shoulder actuation mechanisms for arm therapy exoskeletons: a comparative study in healthy subjects
【2h】

Comfort of two shoulder actuation mechanisms for arm therapy exoskeletons: a comparative study in healthy subjects

机译:手臂治疗外骨骼的两种肩部驱动机制的舒适性:健康受试者的比较研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Robotic exoskeletons can be used to study and treat patients with neurological impairments. They can guide and support the human limb over a large range of motion, which requires that the movement trajectory of the exoskeleton coincide with the one of the human arm. This is straightforward to achieve for rather simple joints like the elbow, but very challenging for complex joints like the human shoulder, which is comprised by several bones and can exhibit a movement with multiple rotational and translational degrees of freedom. Thus, several research groups have developed different shoulder actuation mechanism. However, there are no experimental studies that directly compare the comfort of two different shoulder actuation mechanisms. In this study, the comfort and the naturalness of the new shoulder actuation mechanism of the ARMin III exoskeleton are compared to a ball-and-socket-type shoulder actuation. The study was conducted in 20 healthy subjects using questionnaires and 3D-motion records to assess comfort and naturalness. The results indicate that the new shoulder actuation is slightly better than a ball-and-socket-type actuation. However, the differences are small, and under the tested conditions, the comfort and the naturalness of the two tested shoulder actuations do not differ a lot.
机译:机器人外骨骼可用于研究和治疗神经功能障碍的患者。它们可以在大范围的运动中引导和支撑人的肢体,这要求外骨骼的运动轨迹与人的一只手臂重合。对于像肘这样的相当简单的关节,这是很容易实现的,但是对于像人的肩膀这样的复杂关节,则是非常具有挑战性的,它由几根骨头组成,并且可以表现出具有多个旋转和平移自由度的运动。因此,几个研究小组已经开发出不同的肩部驱动机制。但是,没有实验研究可以直接比较两种不同的肩部驱动机制的舒适性。在这项研究中,将ARMin III外骨骼的新型肩部致动机制的舒适性和自然性与球窝式肩部致动进行了比较。该研究使用问卷和3D运动记录在20名健康受试者中进行,以评估舒适度和自然度。结果表明,新的肩部驱动比球窝式驱动更好。但是,差异很小,在测试条件下,两次测试的肩部致动的舒适度和自然度差异不大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号